A sphere of resonance for networked learning in the ‘non-places’ of our universities

Sarah Hayes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The logic of ‘time’ in modern capitalist society appears to be a fixed concept. Time dictates human activity with a regularity, which as long ago as 1944, George Woodcock referred to as The Tyranny of the Clock. Seventy years on, Hartmut Rosa suggests humans no longer maintain speed to achieve something new, but simply to preserve the status quo, in a ‘social acceleration’ that is lethal to democracy. Political engagement takes time we no longer have, as we rush between our virtual spaces and ‘non-places’ of higher education. I suggest it’s time to confront the conspirators that, in partnership with the clock, accelerate our social engagements with technology in the context of learning. Through Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) I reveal an alarming situation if we don’t. With reference to Bauman’s Liquid Modernity, I observe a ‘lightness’ in policy texts where humans have been ‘liquified’ Separating people from their own labour with technology in policy maintains the flow of speed a neoliberal economy demands. I suggest a new ‘solidity’ of human presence is required as we write about networked learning. ‘Writing ourselves back in’ requires a commitment to ‘be there’ in policy and provide arguments that decelerate the tyranny of time. I am though ever-mindful that social acceleration is also of our own making, and there is every possibility that we actually enjoy it.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-278
Number of pages14
JournalE-learning and Digital Media
Volume12
Issue number3-4
Early online date27 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 May 2015

Bibliographical note

*

Keywords

  • time policy
  • critical discourse analysis
  • networked learning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A sphere of resonance for networked learning in the ‘non-places’ of our universities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this