TY - JOUR
T1 - Are there clinical and demographic differences between morbidly obese patients with and without severe obstructive sleep apnoea?
AU - Hancox, Laura
AU - Bonsels, Elizabeth
AU - Capper, Claire
AU - Palloyova, Maria
AU - Banerjee, Dev
AU - Taheri, Shahrad
N1 - Abstracts of the 5th Annual Scientific Meeting of the British Obesity & Metabolic Surgery Society, (BOMSS) 23-24 January 2014, Leamington Spa, UK
PY - 2014/4/1
Y1 - 2014/4/1
N2 - Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in obese
adults and independently linked to metabolic disturbances. Our study aimed to
determine demographic and clinical differences in morbidly obese patients with
severe OSA and those without OSA.
Methods: Data was obtained from the Heart of England trust database for 56
morbidly obese (BMI≥40 kg/m
2
) adults with polysomnographically-established
severe OSA (apnoea hypopnea index-AHI≥30 events/hour; n = 30) or no OSA
(AHI < 5 events/hour; n = 26). Age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, prevalence of type 2
diabetes (T2DM), HbA1c (DCCT-aligned), and bariatric surgery intervention
were compared between the two subgroups at baseline and at 12–18 month
follow-up.
Results: Compared to non-OSA adults, OSA patients were older (P = 0.005)
and more obese (P = 0.025), with trends towards a higher prevalence of T2DM
(P = 0.054) and male sex (P = 0.073). The presence of T2DM was associated
with older age (P = 0.008), male sex (P = 0.041), and lower minimum oxygen
saturation (P = 0.033) in the entire cohort. Follow-up HbA1c values were
improved [6.7(6–7.8) vs. 6.6(5.9-7.2)%; P = 0.028] in T2DM patients with
treated OSA. There was no significant difference but greater variability in
follow-up decrease in HbA1c in OSA T2DM patients on ventilatory treatment
who underwent bariatric surgery than in controls without surgical intervention
[−0.9 ± 1.15 vs. −1.1 ± 0.27%; P = 0.038].
Conclusion: Obesity, age, and male sex are important risk factors for OSA,
even in a morbidly obese population. Complex management of OSA and obesity
is associated with improved T2DM control. The greater variability in follow-up
HbA1c in T2DM patients undergoing weight-loss surgery highlights the need
for improved guidelines for T2DM management after bariatric surgery.
AB - Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent in obese
adults and independently linked to metabolic disturbances. Our study aimed to
determine demographic and clinical differences in morbidly obese patients with
severe OSA and those without OSA.
Methods: Data was obtained from the Heart of England trust database for 56
morbidly obese (BMI≥40 kg/m
2
) adults with polysomnographically-established
severe OSA (apnoea hypopnea index-AHI≥30 events/hour; n = 30) or no OSA
(AHI < 5 events/hour; n = 26). Age, sex, ethnicity, BMI, prevalence of type 2
diabetes (T2DM), HbA1c (DCCT-aligned), and bariatric surgery intervention
were compared between the two subgroups at baseline and at 12–18 month
follow-up.
Results: Compared to non-OSA adults, OSA patients were older (P = 0.005)
and more obese (P = 0.025), with trends towards a higher prevalence of T2DM
(P = 0.054) and male sex (P = 0.073). The presence of T2DM was associated
with older age (P = 0.008), male sex (P = 0.041), and lower minimum oxygen
saturation (P = 0.033) in the entire cohort. Follow-up HbA1c values were
improved [6.7(6–7.8) vs. 6.6(5.9-7.2)%; P = 0.028] in T2DM patients with
treated OSA. There was no significant difference but greater variability in
follow-up decrease in HbA1c in OSA T2DM patients on ventilatory treatment
who underwent bariatric surgery than in controls without surgical intervention
[−0.9 ± 1.15 vs. −1.1 ± 0.27%; P = 0.038].
Conclusion: Obesity, age, and male sex are important risk factors for OSA,
even in a morbidly obese population. Complex management of OSA and obesity
is associated with improved T2DM control. The greater variability in follow-up
HbA1c in T2DM patients undergoing weight-loss surgery highlights the need
for improved guidelines for T2DM management after bariatric surgery.
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/13652168/101/s3
U2 - 10.1002/bjs.2014.101.issue-s3
DO - 10.1002/bjs.2014.101.issue-s3
M3 - Conference abstract
SN - 0007-1323
VL - 101
SP - 11
JO - The British Journal of Surgery
JF - The British Journal of Surgery
IS - s3
M1 - P08
ER -