Authors’ reply to the comment by Zhang et al

N. Corp, G. Mansell, S. Stynes, G. Wynne‐Jones, L. Morsø, J.C. Hill, D.A. van der Windt

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter, comment/opinion or interviewpeer-review

Abstract

We thank Zhang et al. (2021) for their interest in our work (Corp et al 2021). As the authors point out these are new versions of the AGREE reporting tools and inevitably there will be some delay in their implementation.

Overall, we concur that in the future teams conducting reviews of guidelines should take the points raised in this letter into consideration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1854
Number of pages1
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain
Volume25
Issue number8
Early online date22 Jun 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Corp, N., Mansell, G., Stynes, S., Wynne-Jones, G., Morsø, L., Hill, J. and van der Windt, D. (2021), Authors’ reply to the comment by Zhang et al. European Journal of Pain. Accepted Author Manuscript., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1829.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Keywords

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Authors’ reply to the comment by Zhang et al'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this