TY - CONF
T1 - Brexiters and Bremainers: Categorization of individuals in online newspaper comment threads
AU - Richardson, Emma
AU - Meredith, Joanne
N1 - Conference code: 15th
PY - 2017/7/21
Y1 - 2017/7/21
N2 - Discussions around the EU referendum in the UK led to the construction of two distinct categories which emerged in and through the country-wide debate. During the campaign, the leave camp became known as ‘Brexiters’ and the remain camp ‘Bremainers’ These particular terms, ‘brexiter’ and ‘bremainer’ did not exist before the referendum, yet seemed to be constructed as categories throughout the course of the campaign. The result of the referendum was that the UK voted for so-called ‘Brexit’ by 52% to 48% suggesting that the countrywas clearly divided. Using conversation analysis (Sacks, 1992) and membership categorisation analysis (Stokoe, 2012), this study explores the ways in which the categories of ‘Brexiters’ and ‘Bremainers’ were invoked in online newspaper comment threads. This research draws on a corpus of comments collected from 4 national UK online newspapers. Data were collected from every article which was predominantly focused on the promise by the ‘Leave’ campaign to be able to give :3350million per week to the NHS if the UK left the EU. This pledgewas key both before and after the vote, and so there were multiple stories which captured the sentiment from prior to and after the referendum results became clear. The analysis will focus on the category predicates which are associated with the terms ‘Brexit’ and ‘Bremain’ and variations on these terms. Additionally, as online postings are ‘designedly interactional’ (Meredith & Potter, 2013), the local interactional context in which these categories are deployed will be considered. Features of the medium which may impact upon the interaction,such as poster anonymity and sequential organisation, will be discussed. We will conclude by showing how members work to align with, and resist these, categories.References Meredith, J., & Potter, J. (2014). Conversation Analysis and Electronic Interactions: Methodological, Analytic and Technical Considerations. In H. L. Lim & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis (pp. 370-393). IGI Global.Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols 1 and 2, edited by Gail Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277-303.
AB - Discussions around the EU referendum in the UK led to the construction of two distinct categories which emerged in and through the country-wide debate. During the campaign, the leave camp became known as ‘Brexiters’ and the remain camp ‘Bremainers’ These particular terms, ‘brexiter’ and ‘bremainer’ did not exist before the referendum, yet seemed to be constructed as categories throughout the course of the campaign. The result of the referendum was that the UK voted for so-called ‘Brexit’ by 52% to 48% suggesting that the countrywas clearly divided. Using conversation analysis (Sacks, 1992) and membership categorisation analysis (Stokoe, 2012), this study explores the ways in which the categories of ‘Brexiters’ and ‘Bremainers’ were invoked in online newspaper comment threads. This research draws on a corpus of comments collected from 4 national UK online newspapers. Data were collected from every article which was predominantly focused on the promise by the ‘Leave’ campaign to be able to give :3350million per week to the NHS if the UK left the EU. This pledgewas key both before and after the vote, and so there were multiple stories which captured the sentiment from prior to and after the referendum results became clear. The analysis will focus on the category predicates which are associated with the terms ‘Brexit’ and ‘Bremain’ and variations on these terms. Additionally, as online postings are ‘designedly interactional’ (Meredith & Potter, 2013), the local interactional context in which these categories are deployed will be considered. Features of the medium which may impact upon the interaction,such as poster anonymity and sequential organisation, will be discussed. We will conclude by showing how members work to align with, and resist these, categories.References Meredith, J., & Potter, J. (2014). Conversation Analysis and Electronic Interactions: Methodological, Analytic and Technical Considerations. In H. L. Lim & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Innovative methods and technologies for electronic discourse analysis (pp. 370-393). IGI Global.Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols 1 and 2, edited by Gail Jefferson). Oxford: Blackwell.Stokoe, E. (2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277-303.
M3 - Abstract
SP - 435
T2 - International Pragmatics Conference
Y2 - 16 July 2017 through 21 July 2017
ER -