TY - JOUR
T1 - Decomposing the sales promotion bump accounting for cross-category effects
AU - Leeflang, Peter S.H.
AU - Parreño Selva, Josefa
AU - van Dijk, Albert
AU - Wittink, Dick R.
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Extant research on the decomposition of unit sales bumps due to price promotions considers these effects only within a single product category. This article introduces a framework that accommodates specific cross-category effects. Empirical results based on daily data measured at the item/SKU level show that the effects of promotions on sales in other categories are modest. Between-category complementary effects (20%) are, on average, substantially larger than between-category substitution effects (11%). Hence, a promotion of an item has an average net spin-off effect of (20 - 11 =) 9% of its own effect. The number of significant cross-category effects is low, which means that we expect that, most of the time, it is sufficient to look at within-category effects only. We also find within-category complementary effects, which implies that competitive items within the category may benefit from a promotion. We find small stockpiling effects (6%), modest cross-item effects (22%), and substantial category-expansion effects (72%). The cross-item effects are the result of cross-item substitution effects within the category (26%) and within-category complementary effects (4%). Approximately 15% (= 11% / 72%) of the category-expansion effect is due to between-category substitution effects of dependent categories.
AB - Extant research on the decomposition of unit sales bumps due to price promotions considers these effects only within a single product category. This article introduces a framework that accommodates specific cross-category effects. Empirical results based on daily data measured at the item/SKU level show that the effects of promotions on sales in other categories are modest. Between-category complementary effects (20%) are, on average, substantially larger than between-category substitution effects (11%). Hence, a promotion of an item has an average net spin-off effect of (20 - 11 =) 9% of its own effect. The number of significant cross-category effects is low, which means that we expect that, most of the time, it is sufficient to look at within-category effects only. We also find within-category complementary effects, which implies that competitive items within the category may benefit from a promotion. We find small stockpiling effects (6%), modest cross-item effects (22%), and substantial category-expansion effects (72%). The cross-item effects are the result of cross-item substitution effects within the category (26%) and within-category complementary effects (4%). Approximately 15% (= 11% / 72%) of the category-expansion effect is due to between-category substitution effects of dependent categories.
KW - cross-category effects
KW - decomposition
KW - brand sales model
KW - store-level scanner data
KW - daily data
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49749116760&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.003
DO - 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2008.03.003
M3 - Article
VL - 25
SP - 201
EP - 214
JO - International Journal of Research in Marketing
JF - International Journal of Research in Marketing
IS - 3
ER -