Abstract
This paper reports on an investigation with first year undergraduate Product Design and Management students within a School of Engineering. The students at the time of this investigation had studied fundamental engineering science and mathematics for one semester. The students were given an open ended, ill formed problem which involved designing a simple bridge to cross a river. They were given a talk on problem solving and given a rubric to follow, if they chose to do so. They were not given any formulae or procedures needed in order to resolve the problem. In theory, they possessed the knowledge to ask the right questions in order to make assumptions but, in practice, it turned out they were unable to link their a priori knowledge to resolve this problem. They were able to solve simple beam problems when given closed questions. The results show they were unable to visualise a simple bridge as an augmented beam problem and ask pertinent questions and hence formulate appropriate assumptions in order to offer resolutions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The 17th SEFI Mathematics working Group Seminar |
Subtitle of host publication | proceedings |
Editors | Burkhard Alpers, et al |
Place of Publication | Brussels (BE) |
Publisher | Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-2-87352-011-3 |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Event | 17th SEFI-MWG European Seminar on Mathematics in Engineering Education - Dublin, Ireland Duration: 23 Jun 2014 → 25 Jun 2014 |
Seminar
Seminar | 17th SEFI-MWG European Seminar on Mathematics in Engineering Education |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Ireland |
City | Dublin |
Period | 23/06/14 → 25/06/14 |