Leaders' shifts in attention during an organizational crisis: Longitudinal evidence of responses to a crisis within a top management team

Ian A. Combe*, David J. Carrington

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Published conference outputChapter

Abstract

This chapter presents the findings of an empirical research study into shifts in the attention of individual leaders within a top management team over three phases when resolving an evolving organizational crisis. The findings question the linear development of cognitive consensus over time. Initially, differences in how to respond to the crisis were found, which were replaced by consensus at the midpoint of data collection, but this consensus was only temporary. It seems that not all of the aftershocks of the crisis were fully understood, because later in the crisis diversity in beliefs were found again. We present an alternative method to help managers resolve differences and achieve consensus in how to resolve a crisis. We advocate analyzing individual differences in attention within causal cognitive maps to aid reflexivity to help in vision formation. This reflexive method has advantages when comparing similarities and differences in attention within individuals over time.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLeader Thinking Skills
Subtitle of host publicationCapacities for Contemporary Leadership
EditorsMichael D. Mumford, Cory A. Higgs
PublisherTaylor & Francis
Chapter6
Pages148-175
Number of pages28
ISBN (Electronic)9781315269573
ISBN (Print)9781138284319
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Leaders' shifts in attention during an organizational crisis: Longitudinal evidence of responses to a crisis within a top management team'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this