TY - JOUR
T1 - Lexical and nonlexical processing in developmental dyslexia: a case for different resources and different impairments
AU - Romani, Cristina
AU - di Betta, Anna M.
AU - Tsouknida, Effie
AU - Olson, Andrew C.
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - In a group of adult dyslexics word reading and, especially, word spelling are predicted more by what we have called lexical learning (tapped by a paired-associate task with pictures and written nonwords) than by phonological skills. Nonword reading and spelling, instead, are not associated with this task but they are predicted by phonological tasks. Consistently, surface and phonological dyslexics show opposite profiles on lexical learning and phonological tasks. The phonological dyslexics are more impaired on the phonological tasks, while the surface dyslexics are equally or more impaired on the lexical learning tasks. Finally, orthographic lexical learning explains more variation in spelling than in reading, and subtyping based on spelling returns more interpretable results than that based on reading. These results suggest that the quality of lexical representations is crucial to adult literacy skills. This is best measured by spelling and best predicted by a task of lexical learning. We hypothesize that lexical learning taps a uniquely human capacity to form new representations by recombining the units of a restricted set.
AB - In a group of adult dyslexics word reading and, especially, word spelling are predicted more by what we have called lexical learning (tapped by a paired-associate task with pictures and written nonwords) than by phonological skills. Nonword reading and spelling, instead, are not associated with this task but they are predicted by phonological tasks. Consistently, surface and phonological dyslexics show opposite profiles on lexical learning and phonological tasks. The phonological dyslexics are more impaired on the phonological tasks, while the surface dyslexics are equally or more impaired on the lexical learning tasks. Finally, orthographic lexical learning explains more variation in spelling than in reading, and subtyping based on spelling returns more interpretable results than that based on reading. These results suggest that the quality of lexical representations is crucial to adult literacy skills. This is best measured by spelling and best predicted by a task of lexical learning. We hypothesize that lexical learning taps a uniquely human capacity to form new representations by recombining the units of a restricted set.
KW - adults
KW - developmental dyslexia
KW - developmental dysgraphia
KW - lexical and nonlexical processing
KW - subgroups
KW - surface dyslexia
KW - learning
KW - lexical acquisition
KW - orthographic processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51849164995&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02643290802347183
U2 - 10.1080/02643290802347183
DO - 10.1080/02643290802347183
M3 - Article
SN - 0264-3294
VL - 25
SP - 798
EP - 830
JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology
JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology
IS - 6
ER -