TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping bioenergy stakeholders
T2 - A systematic and scientometric review of capabilities and expertise in bioenergy research in the United Kingdom
AU - Gómez-Marín, N.
AU - Bridgwater, A. V.
PY - 2021/3/1
Y1 - 2021/3/1
N2 - This work, led by the SUPERGEN Bioenergy Hub of United Kingdom (UK), examines the current status of the UK bioenergy research, identifies important research gaps and makes recommendations for exploitation of current capabilities and future research development. It was based on a survey-based research covering 71 bioenergy research stakeholders’ responses and a taxonomy map with key bioenergy topics and subtopics carefully defined. This novel study adapts the concept of “business intelligence” to innovation, in order to transform data into actionable intelligence that informs about strategic decisions. The map shows that the UK bioenergy research explores the whole bioenergy chain, and the areas with high probability of exploitation and improvement identified are: biomass pre-treatment; application of bioenergy products and standardisation, portfolio of commercialisation opportunities, and research into market opportunities. Working on them will help technology and bio-products to be market-ready. To complement the outcomes of this map, a scientometric review was done through analysing the trend of the number of publication, publication impacts, and stakeholders’ co-authorships. The study reveals that pyrolysis had the highest number of publications during 2017, in agreement with the major number of participants; and the highest publication growth was found in both pyrolysis and gasification. Conversely, combustion, which had the lowest number of stakeholders (by 30%), had the highest number of publications until 2015, indicating combustion research is more concentrated in specific stakeholders. Hydrolysis and fermentation showed high number of research stakeholders, but the lowest number of publications suggest that more effort in publication should be done.
AB - This work, led by the SUPERGEN Bioenergy Hub of United Kingdom (UK), examines the current status of the UK bioenergy research, identifies important research gaps and makes recommendations for exploitation of current capabilities and future research development. It was based on a survey-based research covering 71 bioenergy research stakeholders’ responses and a taxonomy map with key bioenergy topics and subtopics carefully defined. This novel study adapts the concept of “business intelligence” to innovation, in order to transform data into actionable intelligence that informs about strategic decisions. The map shows that the UK bioenergy research explores the whole bioenergy chain, and the areas with high probability of exploitation and improvement identified are: biomass pre-treatment; application of bioenergy products and standardisation, portfolio of commercialisation opportunities, and research into market opportunities. Working on them will help technology and bio-products to be market-ready. To complement the outcomes of this map, a scientometric review was done through analysing the trend of the number of publication, publication impacts, and stakeholders’ co-authorships. The study reveals that pyrolysis had the highest number of publications during 2017, in agreement with the major number of participants; and the highest publication growth was found in both pyrolysis and gasification. Conversely, combustion, which had the lowest number of stakeholders (by 30%), had the highest number of publications until 2015, indicating combustion research is more concentrated in specific stakeholders. Hydrolysis and fermentation showed high number of research stakeholders, but the lowest number of publications suggest that more effort in publication should be done.
KW - Bioenergy
KW - Biomass
KW - Knowledge management
KW - Research gaps
KW - Research stakeholders
KW - Scientometric review
KW - State of the art
KW - Taxonomy map
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85095578021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120307826?via%3Dihub
U2 - 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110496
DO - 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110496
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85095578021
SN - 1364-0321
VL - 137
JO - Renewable and sustainable energy reviews
JF - Renewable and sustainable energy reviews
M1 - 110496
ER -