TY - JOUR
T1 - Membrane protein extraction and purification using styrene-maleic acid (SMA) co-polymer
T2 - effect of variations in polymer structure
AU - Morrison, Kerrie A.
AU - Akram, Aneel
AU - Mathews, Ashlyn
AU - Khan, Zoeya A.
AU - Patel, Jaimin H.
AU - Zhou, Chumin
AU - Hardy, David John
AU - Moore-Kelly, Charles
AU - Patel, Roshani
AU - Odiba, Victor
AU - Knowles, Tim
AU - Javed, Masood-ul-Hassan
AU - Chmel, Nikola P.
AU - Dafforn, Timothy R.
AU - Rothnie, Alice Jane
N1 - Biochemical Journal. This is not the final peer-reviewed Version of Record, which is available on http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160723
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - The use of styrene maleic acid (SMA) co-polymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, whilst retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene to maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA) which vary in size and shape were used. Our results show that several polymers can be used to extract membrane proteins comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular weight (7.5-10 kDa) is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.
AB - The use of styrene maleic acid (SMA) co-polymers to extract and purify transmembrane proteins, whilst retaining their native bilayer environment, overcomes many of the disadvantages associated with conventional detergent based procedures. This approach has huge potential for the future of membrane protein structural and functional studies. In this investigation we have systematically tested a range of commercially available SMA polymers, varying in both the ratio of styrene to maleic acid and in total size, for the ability to extract, purify and stabilise transmembrane proteins. Three different membrane proteins (BmrA, LeuT and ZipA) which vary in size and shape were used. Our results show that several polymers can be used to extract membrane proteins comparably to conventional detergents. A styrene:maleic acid ratio of either 2:1 or 3:1, combined with a relatively small average molecular weight (7.5-10 kDa) is optimal for membrane extraction, and this appears to be independent of the protein size, shape or expression system. A subset of polymers were taken forward for purification, functional and stability tests. Following a one-step affinity purification SMA 2000 was found to be the best choice for yield, purity and function. However the other polymers offer subtle differences in size and sensitivity to divalent cations that may be useful for a variety of downstream applications.
UR - http://www.biochemj.org/content/473/23/4349
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.17036/ff13833e-68c5-449f-82f2-4f07363fc55d
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009476554&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1042/BCJ20160723
DO - 10.1042/BCJ20160723
M3 - Article
C2 - 27694389
AN - SCOPUS:85009476554
SN - 0264-6021
VL - 473
SP - 4349
EP - 4360
JO - Biochemical Journal
JF - Biochemical Journal
IS - 23
ER -