TY - JOUR
T1 - Mind the context gap: a critical review of engagement within the public sector and an agenda for future research.
AU - Fletcher, Luke
AU - Bailey, Catherine
AU - Alfes, Kerstin
AU - Madden, Adrian
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in The International Journal of Human Resource Management on 15 Oct 2019, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674358
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - In this review paper, we critically examine the evidence base relating to engagement within the public sector given a wide range of public services have faced acute human resource challenges over recent years. Our review of 188 empirical studies reveals that much of the evidence focuses attention on individual and job level factors, such that specific public sector contextual contingencies have rarely been considered. Through identifying significant ‘context gaps’, we present a future research agenda addressing the following key areas: i) clarifying the relationship between engagement and public service motivation, ii) further contextualizing general engagement models, iii) exploring cultural, socio-political, and institutional factors in more depth, iv) encouraging a more critical perspective on engagement, v) understanding the variation in the experience of engagement across different public services/delivery models, and vi) connecting more strongly with practical concerns and initiatives within public organizations. In presenting this agenda, we highlight how engagement and HRM scholars can more strongly embed their research within a sectoral context.
AB - In this review paper, we critically examine the evidence base relating to engagement within the public sector given a wide range of public services have faced acute human resource challenges over recent years. Our review of 188 empirical studies reveals that much of the evidence focuses attention on individual and job level factors, such that specific public sector contextual contingencies have rarely been considered. Through identifying significant ‘context gaps’, we present a future research agenda addressing the following key areas: i) clarifying the relationship between engagement and public service motivation, ii) further contextualizing general engagement models, iii) exploring cultural, socio-political, and institutional factors in more depth, iv) encouraging a more critical perspective on engagement, v) understanding the variation in the experience of engagement across different public services/delivery models, and vi) connecting more strongly with practical concerns and initiatives within public organizations. In presenting this agenda, we highlight how engagement and HRM scholars can more strongly embed their research within a sectoral context.
KW - contextualization
KW - employee engagement
KW - public services
KW - research agenda
KW - systematic review
KW - work engagement
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09585192.2019.1674358
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074599483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2019.1674358
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2019.1674358
M3 - Article
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 31
SP - 6
EP - 46
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 1
ER -