TY - JOUR
T1 - Morningness-eveningness orientation and attitude change
T2 - evidence for greater systematic processing and attitude change at optimal time-of-day
AU - Martin, Pearl Y.
AU - Martin, Robin
PY - 2013/4
Y1 - 2013/4
N2 - This study examines the relationship between morningness-eveningness orientation and time-of day on attitude change, and tests the hypothesis that people will be more persuaded when tested at their optimal time-of-day (i.e., morning for M-types and evening for E-types) than non-optimal time-of-day (i.e., evening for M-Types and morning for E-types). Two hundred and twenty participants read a message that contained either strong vs. weak quality counter-attitudinal arguments (anti-voluntary euthanasia) in the morning (9.00. a.m.) or in the evening (7.00. p.m.). When tested at their respective optimal time-of-day (for both M- and E-types) there was a reliable difference in attitude change between the strong vs. weak messages (indicating message processing had occurred) while there was no difference between strong vs. weak messages when tested at their non-optimal time-of-day. In addition, the amount of message-congruent thinking mediated the attitude change. The results show that M- and E-types pay greater attention to and elaborate on a persuasive message at their optimal time-of-day, and this leads to increased attitude change, compared to those tested at their non-optimal time-of-day.
AB - This study examines the relationship between morningness-eveningness orientation and time-of day on attitude change, and tests the hypothesis that people will be more persuaded when tested at their optimal time-of-day (i.e., morning for M-types and evening for E-types) than non-optimal time-of-day (i.e., evening for M-Types and morning for E-types). Two hundred and twenty participants read a message that contained either strong vs. weak quality counter-attitudinal arguments (anti-voluntary euthanasia) in the morning (9.00. a.m.) or in the evening (7.00. p.m.). When tested at their respective optimal time-of-day (for both M- and E-types) there was a reliable difference in attitude change between the strong vs. weak messages (indicating message processing had occurred) while there was no difference between strong vs. weak messages when tested at their non-optimal time-of-day. In addition, the amount of message-congruent thinking mediated the attitude change. The results show that M- and E-types pay greater attention to and elaborate on a persuasive message at their optimal time-of-day, and this leads to increased attitude change, compared to those tested at their non-optimal time-of-day.
KW - morningness–eveningness
KW - chronotype
KW - time-of-day
KW - attitude change
KW - persuasion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871741265&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.031
DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.031
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84871741265
SN - 0191-8869
VL - 54
SP - 551
EP - 556
JO - Personality and Individual Differences
JF - Personality and Individual Differences
IS - 5
ER -