TY - JOUR
T1 - Provocation of the ocular surface to investigate the evaporative pathophysiology of dry eye disease
AU - Bilkhu, Paramdeep
AU - Wolffsohn, James S.
AU - Purslow, Christine
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Purpose: To investigate whether standard clinical measures of tear film stability, meniscus height and symptomology reflect changes in evaporation rate induced by ocular surface provocations. Methods: Forty participants (23.8 ± 4.5 years, 53 % female) with healthy to mild dry eyes underwent two tear film provocations in random sequence on separate occasions: playing a tablet computer high concentration game (http://slither.io/) for 30 min; and receiving treatment with humidity goggles for 10 min followed by liposomal spray application. Measures at baseline and 30 min later were: Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire, tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), dynamic tear film lipid layer pattern (DLP) and tear film evaporation (TFE). Results: There were no differences in the baseline measurements before each provocation (p > 0.05). Dry eye symptoms significantly worsened with concentration task (p < 0.001) and improved with treatment (p < 0.001). DLP and LLT significantly increased with treatment (p < 0.05), but was unaffected with the concentration task (p > 0.05). NIBUT declined with the concentration task (p = 0.015), but was not enhanced with treatment (p = 0.142). TMH increased after treatment (p = 0.001) and decreased with the concentration task (p = 0.006). While evaporation decreased with the concentration task (p < 0.001), treatment had no effect (p = 0.333). LLT was associated with evaporation (p = 0.036) and additionally with symptom severity (p = 0.002) and tear volume (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Sub-classifying dry eye based on an ‘evaporative’ component to inform treatment seems over-simplistic. However objective TMH, NIBUT and LLT seem to be the key clinical metrics that drive ocular comfort.
AB - Purpose: To investigate whether standard clinical measures of tear film stability, meniscus height and symptomology reflect changes in evaporation rate induced by ocular surface provocations. Methods: Forty participants (23.8 ± 4.5 years, 53 % female) with healthy to mild dry eyes underwent two tear film provocations in random sequence on separate occasions: playing a tablet computer high concentration game (http://slither.io/) for 30 min; and receiving treatment with humidity goggles for 10 min followed by liposomal spray application. Measures at baseline and 30 min later were: Symptom Assessment iN Dry Eye (SANDE) questionnaire, tear film lipid layer thickness (LLT), non-invasive tear film break-up time (NIBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), dynamic tear film lipid layer pattern (DLP) and tear film evaporation (TFE). Results: There were no differences in the baseline measurements before each provocation (p > 0.05). Dry eye symptoms significantly worsened with concentration task (p < 0.001) and improved with treatment (p < 0.001). DLP and LLT significantly increased with treatment (p < 0.05), but was unaffected with the concentration task (p > 0.05). NIBUT declined with the concentration task (p = 0.015), but was not enhanced with treatment (p = 0.142). TMH increased after treatment (p = 0.001) and decreased with the concentration task (p = 0.006). While evaporation decreased with the concentration task (p < 0.001), treatment had no effect (p = 0.333). LLT was associated with evaporation (p = 0.036) and additionally with symptom severity (p = 0.002) and tear volume (p = 0.017). Conclusions: Sub-classifying dry eye based on an ‘evaporative’ component to inform treatment seems over-simplistic. However objective TMH, NIBUT and LLT seem to be the key clinical metrics that drive ocular comfort.
KW - Dry eye
KW - Evaporation
KW - Tear film
UR - https://www.contactlensjournal.com/article/S1367-0484(20)30059-X/pdf
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083329268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.014
DO - 10.1016/j.clae.2020.03.014
M3 - Article
SN - 1367-0484
VL - 44
SP - 24
EP - 29
JO - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
JF - Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
IS - 1
ER -