Abstract
Rouder and Haaf (2021) propose that studying qualitative individual differences would be a useful tool for researchers. I agree with their central message. I use this commentary to highlight examples from the literature where similar questions have been asked, and how researchers have addressed them with existing tools. I also observe that while the hierarchical Bayesian framework is a useful tool for studying individual differences, it does not relieve us of the requirement to evaluate the forms of reliability that are critical to our research questions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 48 |
Journal | Journal of Cognition |
Volume | 4 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 Aug 2021 |
Bibliographical note
© 2021 The Author(s). Thisis an open-access article
distributed under the terms
of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International
License (CC-BY 4.0), which
permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the
original author and source
are credited. See http://
creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords
- Cognitive Control
- Mathematical modelling
- Statistical analysis