TY - JOUR
T1 - Scale and scope economies and the efficient vertical and horizontal configuration of the water industry
T2 - a survey of the literature
AU - Saal, David
AU - Arocena, Pablo
AU - Maziotis, Alexandros
AU - Triebs, Thomas
PY - 2013/3/31
Y1 - 2013/3/31
N2 - This paper surveys the literature on scale and scope economies in the water and sewerage industry. The magnitude of scale and scope economies determines the cost efficient configuration of any industry. In the case of a regulated sector, reliable estimates of these economies are relevant to inform reform proposals that promote vertical (un)bundling and mergers. The empirical evidence allows some general conclusions. First, there is considerable evidence for the existence of vertical scope economies between upstream water production and distribution. Second, there is only mixed evidence on the existence of (dis)economies of scope between water and sewerage activities. Third, economies of scale exist up to certain output level, and diseconomies of scale arise if the company increases its size beyond this level. However, the optimal scale of utilities also appears to vary considerably between countries. Finally, we briefly consider the implications of our findings for water pricing and point to several directions for necessary future empirical research on the measurement of these economies, and explaining their cross country variation.
AB - This paper surveys the literature on scale and scope economies in the water and sewerage industry. The magnitude of scale and scope economies determines the cost efficient configuration of any industry. In the case of a regulated sector, reliable estimates of these economies are relevant to inform reform proposals that promote vertical (un)bundling and mergers. The empirical evidence allows some general conclusions. First, there is considerable evidence for the existence of vertical scope economies between upstream water production and distribution. Second, there is only mixed evidence on the existence of (dis)economies of scope between water and sewerage activities. Third, economies of scale exist up to certain output level, and diseconomies of scale arise if the company increases its size beyond this level. However, the optimal scale of utilities also appears to vary considerably between countries. Finally, we briefly consider the implications of our findings for water pricing and point to several directions for necessary future empirical research on the measurement of these economies, and explaining their cross country variation.
KW - scope and integration economies
KW - scale
KW - unbundling
KW - water and sewage utilities
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878277199&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rne.2013.12.issue-1/rne-2012-0004/rne-2012-0004.xml
U2 - 10.1515/rne-2012-0004
DO - 10.1515/rne-2012-0004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84878277199
SN - 2194-5993
VL - 12
SP - 93
EP - 129
JO - Review of network economics
JF - Review of network economics
IS - 1
ER -