Securing business-to-business relationships: the impact of switching costs

Markus Blut, Heiner Evanschitzky*, Christof Backhaus, John Rudd, Michael Marck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


While the relationship marketing literature acknowledges the importance of switching costs for increasing customer retention, little is known about its relevance in industrial markets. In particular, it is unclear whether switching costs, and associated dimensions, impact on behavioral outcomes of buyer–seller relationships in business-to-business (B2B) markets. In order to contribute to theory development in this important area, our research first explores the dimensions of switching costs for the B2B domain and also tests the relative impact of these dimensions on business customers' actual purchase behavior. Results suggest that switching costs in B2B settings are a multi-faceted construct, including (i) procedural, (ii) financial, and (iii) relational switching costs. Moreover, we find relational switching costs to be most important for securing B2B buyer–seller relationships since they impact a customer's (a) share-of-wallet, (b) cross-buying behavior, and (c) actual switching behavior. While procedural switching costs only influence share-of-wallet, financial switching costs solely impact customer's cross-buying behavior. These findings contribute to a better understanding on how to secure B2B buyer–seller relationships.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-90
Number of pages9
JournalIndustrial Marketing Management
Early online date23 May 2015
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2016

Bibliographical note

© 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International


  • buyer–seller relationships
  • switching costs
  • purchase behavior
  • customer satisfaction
  • mixed-method approach


Dive into the research topics of 'Securing business-to-business relationships: the impact of switching costs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this