Abstract
This paper examines the rule against capricious purpose trusts and examines its application in English law but more particularly drawing upon the experiences of other common law jurisdictions and seeks to create a rationale for the operation o the doctrine in the common law world.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 109-119 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Trust Law International |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 3 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- United States
- Canada
- Australia
- capriciousness
- comparative law
- enforcement
- purpose trusts
- Scotland