The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: The dominance of social implications in framing the policy response

Gøril Ursin; Ingunn Skjesol; Jonathan Tritter

doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004

The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: The dominance of social implications in framing the policy response

Gøril Ursin, Ingunn Skjesol, Jonathan Tritter

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objectives To describe the impact and policy response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Norway and the implications this has for future policy development and Norwegian society. Methods Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. Results : Three different agendas motivated Norwegian policy: stemming the spread of the virus domestically, mitigating the impact on the economy and addressing the social costs of the policy response. Conclusions The oil and gas industry and the Sovereign Wealth Fund have permitted Norway to manage the costs of the pandemic. But may also lead to a shift in government priorities in health, social and economic policy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	663-672
Number of pages	10
Journal	Health Policy and Technology
Volume	9
Issue number	4
Early online date	28 Aug 2020
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004
Publication status	Published - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Keywords

COVID-19
Norway
Policy
Social impact

Access to Document

10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004Licence: CC BY 3.0

The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway
©2020 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
Final published version, 2.18 MBLicence: CC BY 3.0

Cite this

@article{969f8cc03a894576be92ccf40a23d8d1,

title = "The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: The dominance of social implications in framing the policy response",

abstract = "Objectives To describe the impact and policy response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Norway and the implications this has for future policy development and Norwegian society. Methods Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. Results : Three different agendas motivated Norwegian policy: stemming the spread of the virus domestically, mitigating the impact on the economy and addressing the social costs of the policy response. Conclusions The oil and gas industry and the Sovereign Wealth Fund have permitted Norway to manage the costs of the pandemic. But may also lead to a shift in government priorities in health, social and economic policy.",

keywords = "COVID-19, Norway, Policy, Social impact",

author = "G{\o}ril Ursin and Ingunn Skjesol and Jonathan Tritter",

note = "{\textcopyright}2020 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) ",

year = "2020",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004",

language = "English",

volume = "9",

pages = "663--672",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: The dominance of social implications in framing the policy response

AU - Ursin, Gøril

AU - Skjesol, Ingunn

AU - Tritter, Jonathan

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Objectives To describe the impact and policy response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Norway and the implications this has for future policy development and Norwegian society. Methods Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. Results : Three different agendas motivated Norwegian policy: stemming the spread of the virus domestically, mitigating the impact on the economy and addressing the social costs of the policy response. Conclusions The oil and gas industry and the Sovereign Wealth Fund have permitted Norway to manage the costs of the pandemic. But may also lead to a shift in government priorities in health, social and economic policy.

AB - Objectives To describe the impact and policy response to the COVID-19 Pandemic on Norway and the implications this has for future policy development and Norwegian society. Methods Documentary analysis of publicly available statistics, government documents and media sources. Results : Three different agendas motivated Norwegian policy: stemming the spread of the virus domestically, mitigating the impact on the economy and addressing the social costs of the policy response. Conclusions The oil and gas industry and the Sovereign Wealth Fund have permitted Norway to manage the costs of the pandemic. But may also lead to a shift in government priorities in health, social and economic policy.

KW - COVID-19

KW - Norway

KW - Policy

KW - Social impact

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883720300769?via%3Dihub

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090313378&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.004

M3 - Article

C2 - 32874857

SN - 2211-8837

VL - 9

SP - 663

EP - 672

JO - Health Policy and Technology

JF - Health Policy and Technology

IS - 4

ER -

The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: The dominance of social implications in framing the policy response

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this