The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK fund

Grahame Boocock, Margaret Woods

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


GRAHAM BOOCOCK AND MARGARET WOODS are Lecturers in Banking and Finance, and Financial Management, respectively, at Loughborough University Business School, England. The paper examines how venture fund managers select their investee companies, by exploring the evaluation criteria and the decision-making process adopted at one United Kingdom regional venture fund (henceforth referred to as the Fund). The analysis confirms that relatively consistent evaluation criteria are applied across the industry and corroborates previous models which suggest that the venture capitalist's decision-making consists of several stages. With the benefit of access to the Fund's internal records, however, this paper adds to the current literature by differentiating the evaluation criteria used at each successive stage of the decision-making process. The paper presents a model of the Fund's activities which demonstrates that the relative importance attached to the evaluation criteria changes as applications are systematically processed. Proposals have to satsfy different criteria at each stage of the decision-making process before they receive funding. In the vast majority of cases, applications are rejected by the fund managers. In addition, the length of time taken by the fund managers in appraising propositions can lead to withdrawal of applications at an advanced stage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)36-57
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Small Business Journal
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1997

Bibliographical note

© Sage 1997. The final publication is available via Sage at


Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK fund'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this