Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness

Rachel Elizabeth Ashworth*, Aoife Mary McDermott, Graeme Currie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Scholars emphasize the need for additional rigor in qualitative research. This inadvertently encourages formulaic and standardized approaches that undermine the benefits of theorizing from rich data. Our study extends debate by emphasizing the importance of sound qualitative public administration research that blends rigor with richness and thereby facilitates effective theorization. Evidence from a narrative review of 31 qualitative studies published within six leading public administration journals demonstrates that effective theorizing is linked to transparency in research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution. In-depth interrogation of four studies that illustrate "inductive theorizing" and "abductive theorizing" identifies plurality in the balance struck between rigor and richness. We derive a broad set of principles that enable researchers to make a convincing "conceptual leap" between data, analysis, and contribution. We also emphasize the need to accommodate pluralistic approaches to theorizing by nuancing requirements for essential aspects of qualitative reporting, versus those amenable to variation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)318-333
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume29
Issue number2
Early online date11 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this