Abstract
Objective: This article aims to examine how individual disposition is influenced by group structures and how this in turn enhances team members’ creative and prosocial behaviors. Building on a person-in-situation theory, we argue that altruism is a communal personality leading to the dual outcome of creativity and prosocial behavior, and altruism can best facilitate the dualoutcomes of creativity and prosocial behaviorwhen teamstandardization is low and when team participation is high. Method: Based on data from346 employees in 86 teams, the results from multilevel modeling largely supported our hypotheses. Results: Altruism is associated with both individual creativity and prosocial behavior when team participation is high. Altruism is associated with individual prosocial behavior when team standardization is low. Conclusions: Our study shows that to foster creativity and prosociality, teams need not only to pay attention to teammembers’ altruistic dispositional tendency but also to build a participative team environment and reduce team standardization to enable such dispositional tendency to be expressed. In doing so, our study offers a newalignment of prescriptions to foster prosociality and creativity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Group Dynamics |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 May 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022. American Psychological Association
This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. Please do not copy or cite without author's permission. The final article is available, upon publication, at: https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000188
Keywords
- Altruism
- Creativity
- Prosocial behavior
- Team participation
- Team standardization